<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>&lt;div&gt; and position | WPDFD.com Forums</title>
  <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/ltdivgt_and_position/</link>
  <description>A Layout forum thread at WPDFD.com</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <pubDate>02/23/05, 054 27 2005 2005:%i:1109190445 15:27:25</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>06/07/13, 158 20 2013 2013:%i:1370586028 02:20:28</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NineLabs Framework Feed Generator</generator>
  <managingEditor>sitemaster@wpdfd.com</managingEditor>
  <webMaster>sitemaster@wpdfd.com</webMaster>
     <item>
    <title>Camelord  said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/ltdivgt_and_position/#p1809</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Hi,<br />i am quiet new to Style the Page with CSS.<br />I read many Articels about it. None of them could answer my question: Why using position: relative;<br />When i just use &lt;div&gt; Tags, its easier to position them with position: absolute;<br /><br />Is there a Case, where relative position is better?<br /><br />Thx<br /><br />camelord]]></description>
    <pubDate>02/23/05, 054 27 2005 2005:%i:1109190445 15:27:25</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/ltdivgt_and_position/#p1809</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Joe Gillespie said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/ltdivgt_and_position/#p1810</link>
    <description><![CDATA[In almost every case, relative is better. Absolute position makes a page solid and inflexible.<br /><br />Trees that bend with the wind do not break.]]></description>
    <pubDate>02/23/05, 054 08 2005 2005:%i:1109192895 16:08:15</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/ltdivgt_and_position/#p1810</guid>
   </item>
   </channel>
</rss