new site, need constructive critisism | WPDFD.com Forums http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/ A Layout forum thread at WPDFD.com en-us 01/27/05, 027 12 2005 2005:%i:1106878375 21:12:55 06/07/13, 158 19 2013 2013:%i:1370589588 03:19:48 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss NineLabs Framework Feed Generator sitemaster@wpdfd.com sitemaster@wpdfd.com Knowthyself said: http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1756
www.angelfire.com/d20/pwernizor]]> 01/27/05, 027 12 2005 2005:%i:1106878375 21:12:55 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1756 Joe Gillespie said: http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1757
Looks fine to me. Some of the background images are a little too bright and interfere with the readability of the text.

I would suggest fixing the background image so that the text scrolls but the background doesn't, as I have here (look at the source).]]> 01/28/05, 028 44 2005 2005:%i:1106905474 04:44:34 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1757 Knowthyself said: http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1758 01/28/05, 028 03 2005 2005:%i:1106946187 16:03:07 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1758 Baxter said: http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1759 Personally, I really want your font to be a pixel bigger.

Whatever your popup is, I'll never see it, so that's a waste fo time.

]]> 01/31/05, 031 50 2005 2005:%i:1107197445 13:50:45 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1759 Knowthyself said: http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1760 01/31/05, 031 09 2005 2005:%i:1107209386 17:09:46 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1760 Joe Gillespie said: http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1761 01/31/05, 031 21 2005 2005:%i:1107213699 18:21:39 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1761 Knowthyself said: http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1762 02/02/05, 033 02 2005 2005:%i:1107392529 20:02:09 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1762 Joe Gillespie said: http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1763 knowthyself said:
Fixed background images now.  I suppose all the people who would have problems with it are probably using IE anyway.  By the way, do you have any idea why IE spaces the "item" divs so far apart?

IE handles 'padding' wrongly  - well, not according to W3C specs - so if you use padding, you can expect a different look in IE. If you get rid of the padding and use something else to create the spacing (ie margin) the look will be more consistent.]]> 02/03/05, 034 38 2005 2005:%i:1107423502 04:38:22 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/new_site_need_constructive_critisism/#p1763