<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>Review My Site | WPDFD.com Forums</title>
  <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/</link>
  <description>A Layout forum thread at WPDFD.com</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <pubDate>04/14/05, 104 48 2005 2005:%i:1113522538 19:48:58</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>06/07/13, 158 00 2013 2013:%i:1370588416 03:00:16</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NineLabs Framework Feed Generator</generator>
  <managingEditor>sitemaster@wpdfd.com</managingEditor>
  <webMaster>sitemaster@wpdfd.com</webMaster>
     <item>
    <title>Bubbatwan  said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1871</link>
    <description><![CDATA[www.goprotex.com]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/14/05, 104 48 2005 2005:%i:1113522538 19:48:58</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1871</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Joe Gillespie said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1872</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>bubbatwan said:</strong><br />
www.goprotex.com</blockquote><br /><br /><br />How can you claim &quot;Professional Web Solutions&quot; with a site that doesn't validate for HTML or CSS. That's not my idea of professional. It shows that you don't care about your customers, browser reliability or future site maintenance.]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/15/05, 105 26 2005 2005:%i:1113550008 03:26:48</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1872</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Bubbatwan  said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1873</link>
    <description><![CDATA[How do i not validate for CSS and HTML. I use em like a pen daily.<br /><br />Bubs]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/18/05, 108 29 2005 2005:%i:1113881346 23:29:06</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1873</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Joe Gillespie said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1874</link>
    <description><![CDATA[That's not what it says here...<br /><br />http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&amp;uri=http%3A//www.goprotex.com/<br /><br />http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2&amp;warning=2&amp;uri=http%3A//www.goprotex.com/]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/19/05, 109 44 2005 2005:%i:1113893074 02:44:34</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1874</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Baxter  said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1875</link>
    <description><![CDATA[God help you when you DO declare a doctype... then you're going to see a lot more. Don't even think about trying to get the browser in standards-compliant mode, caues you're a LONG way from any doctype that's not parsing in quirks mode.]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/19/05, 109 35 2005 2005:%i:1113917738 09:35:38</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/layout/review_my_site/#p1875</guid>
   </item>
   </channel>
</rss