http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/ A Miscellaneous forum thread at WPDFD.com en-us 07/19/04, 201 18 2004 2004:%i:1090257490 13:18:10 06/07/13, 158 36 2013 2013:%i:1370594191 04:36:31 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss NineLabs Framework Feed Generator sitemaster@wpdfd.com sitemaster@wpdfd.com http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1104
I would very much appreciate it if my fellow designers/developers could provide me with some critique.  

It's just a test page, and the overall design will undergo more changes.  I am mainly interested in how the page renders in different browsers, as its my first bigger project in XHTML, using a CSS layout.  I have tested myself on IE6, Netscape 6, Opera 7, Firefox, Netscape 4 (without style), WebPro on PalmOS, and the JAWS screenreader.  I am quite pleased with how accessible the page is, yet I would love to know how the page renders in certain Mac browsers, and IE5 for Windows.

Please don't click on any links - it's just about this particular page.

http://www.korenwebdesign.com/samples/chh_boxmodel/centers_of_excellence/neonatal_icu.php

Thanks in advance,

Ed]]> 07/19/04, 201 18 2004 2004:%i:1090257490 13:18:10 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1104 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1105
The GO button is broken and shows as a missing image in Safari and IE. This also causes problems when you run the mouse over it as the whole form element jumps around.

Running it throught the W3C validator, shows errors in the JavaScript and in other places. You really should validate your documents before asking for critiques - if only to save the blushes

Everything else looks fine.]]> 07/19/04, 201 40 2004 2004:%i:1090266041 15:40:41 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1105 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1106

I am pleased to know that the layout seems to work fine on those Mac browsers.  I know that IE5 in Windows doesn't work well yet, so I have some more work to do.  And I think IE4 on Mac supports import of stylesheets, but doesn't have sufficient CSS support, so I will shield it from the layout styles.

Thanks for taking the time to comment.

Ed]]> 07/19/04, 201 58 2004 2004:%i:1090267137 15:58:57 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1106 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1107
I wouldn't worry too much about how it looks in IE and Netscape 4.x. Those are old, bad browsers. If the text shows up in them, be happy. You'll go nuts trying to make the formatting look the same in both good and bad browsers.]]> 07/19/04, 201 32 2004 2004:%i:1090294348 23:32:28 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1107 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1108
Thanks for the comments.

Ed]]> 07/19/04, 201 42 2004 2004:%i:1090294920 23:42:00 http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/miscellaneous/site_critique_please/#p1108