<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>"Keywords" meta tag not useful in SEO | WPDFD.com Forums</title>
  <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/</link>
  <description>A News forum thread at WPDFD.com</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <pubDate>03/17/10, 076 47 2010 2010:%i:1268794073 02:47:53</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>05/21/03, 141 37 2203 2203:%i:7364871478 13:37:58</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NineLabs Framework Feed Generator</generator>
  <managingEditor>sitemaster@wpdfd.com</managingEditor>
  <webMaster>sitemaster@wpdfd.com</webMaster>
     <item>
    <title>Navin Prakash said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3334</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Google stops the "keywords" meta tag in ranking web search results, for details please read here:<br />
<br />
<a class="external" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.c...a-tag.html">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.c...a-tag.html</a><br />
<br />
But yaar they didn&#39;t mention that if we still use "Keyword" meta tag in our site then it can be harmful for our site?? Undecided If some body know about it please suggest me here...]]></description>
    <pubDate>03/17/10, 076 47 2010 2010:%i:1268794073 02:47:53</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3334</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Herman Brummer said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3354</link>
    <description><![CDATA[honestly this is old news! The meta keyword tag is not harmful, but useless as there are almost no SE&#39;s left that use it.<br />
 ]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/05/10, 095 11 2010 2010:%i:1270483869 16:11:09</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3354</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Herman Brummer said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3355</link>
    <description><![CDATA[one, thing that they are still used by is directories, so they have some value, but that would hardly count half a percent]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/05/10, 095 12 2010 2010:%i:1270483934 16:12:14</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3355</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Image Proz said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3370</link>
    <description><![CDATA[What about keyword phrases? Are these being used?]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/18/10, 108 43 2010 2010:%i:1271591014 11:43:34</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3370</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Mike Crone said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3375</link>
    <description><![CDATA[To Google the most important factor is "quality" links to your site. By this they mean the content in the links is relevant to your content and not just a link exchange.<br />
They also look at the length of time the website has been online and how often the content is updated.<br />
Keyword phrases not used.<br />
<br />
Mike...]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/20/10, 110 37 2010 2010:%i:1271770664 13:37:44</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3375</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Rejoynic Jonson said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3376</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>Herman Brummer said:</strong> <br />
honestly this is old news! The meta keyword tag is not harmful, but useless as there are almost no SE&#39;s left that use it.<br />
 </blockquote><br />
I too agree with him.]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/21/10, 111 38 2010 2010:%i:1271817535 02:38:55</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3376</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Ammy Gill said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3601</link>
    <description><![CDATA[To have good visibility on Google use of relevant keywords on site are necessary. So i think that its no harm to use keywords meta tag. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>09/18/10, 261 56 2010 2010:%i:1284814600 12:56:40</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3601</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Sandra Necaise said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3627</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Also for Google the best is quality and excellent content, that people likes and visit. And quality links. That makes your site rank higher.]]></description>
    <pubDate>09/30/10, 273 40 2010 2010:%i:1285857631 14:40:31</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3627</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Benivolent Softtech said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3754</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Really this is previous reports! The Meta keyword tag is not harmful, but a waste of time as there is almost no SE&#39;O’s left that use it.]]></description>
    <pubDate>12/17/10, 351 19 2010 2010:%i:1292559549 04:19:09</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3754</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Aaron Smith said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3762</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Meta tag keywords is not useful but description is most important in meta tag.<br />
<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>12/21/10, 355 35 2010 2010:%i:1292916900 07:35:00</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3762</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Aaron Smith said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3763</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Meta tag keywords is not useful but description is most important in meta tag.<br />
<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>12/21/10, 355 36 2010 2010:%i:1292916992 07:36:32</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3763</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Viktor Richardson said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3798</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Why not "waste" the 10 seconds it takes to type some keywords? There seems to be no harm in having keywords, and there are still directories and maybe even some SE&#39;s that cares about meta keywords.<br />
<br />
I agree that meta description still is useful, but not really for SEO. I use the description tag to reach out with a message to the user. For example that there are free shipping or some other advantage, or maybe some current offer. That will not only show upp in the search results, but also if someone post a link on facebook.]]></description>
    <pubDate>01/10/11, 010 03 2011 2011:%i:1294639404 06:03:24</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3798</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Pamela Scot said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3815</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Yes, google does not read "Keywords" META tags now a days. Common website owner , designers, and SEO&#39;S are responsible for this. Most of the time websites having keywords in their "Keywords" Meta tags but not found in the page content. This is most dangerous think. Earlier days people place lots of keywords in the meta tags, to misguide google. The site owner thought that google will index their website with those keywords. For these reason google does not read this meta  tags becoause most of the time most of the keywords are absent in the main content. I hope you people will agree with me. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>01/17/11, 017 43 2011 2011:%i:1295232184 02:43:04</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3815</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Anny Php  said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3818</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Meta keyword is not harmful for your site!]]></description>
    <pubDate>01/18/11, 018 15 2011 2011:%i:1295381740 20:15:40</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3818</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Jake Mcgreg said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3832</link>
    <description><![CDATA[I agree. Unless Google suggested it but it&#39;s not harmful.]]></description>
    <pubDate>01/24/11, 024 25 2011 2011:%i:1295828716 00:25:16</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3832</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Brown Erik said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3844</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Well, Search Engine optimizers have already left the idea of using Meta keyword tags! Yes, they do not possess any kind of threat to those who still use it but that do not make them useful either. Since Google has stopped Meta keyword tagging, Search Engine optimizers do not need it anymore. The only area where Meta keyword tags can still be found being used is directories! But then again, that scarcely accounts for what it was used for previously!]]></description>
    <pubDate>01/24/11, 024 56 2011 2011:%i:1295834206 01:56:46</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3844</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Jack Wang said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3882</link>
    <description><![CDATA[I agree that meta description still is useful, but not really for SEO. I use the description tag to reach out with a message to the user. For example that there are free shipping or some other advantage, or maybe some current offer. That will not only show upp in the search results, but also if someone post a link on facebook.<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>02/16/11, 047 40 2011 2011:%i:1297827600 03:40:00</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3882</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Carlos Anderson said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3887</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Despite the fact that it&#39;s old news, I still see that people here are surprised to learn about these changes. Well, the search engines are evolving, particularly Google, and we are going to see lots of changes in the future. It was fun to spend my time here but I still needs to clean the dishes, the griddle and hurry up for my job. I also wanted to say that I don&#39;t know much about the effectiveness of meta tags and such about your rankings in the search engines, but it probably wouldn&#39;t cause any harm to add the keywords anyway.]]></description>
    <pubDate>02/16/11, 047 55 2011 2011:%i:1297857351 11:55:51</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3887</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Website Designerss said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3958</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Meta keyword is not harmful your site]]></description>
    <pubDate>03/25/11, 084 54 2011 2011:%i:1301039677 07:54:37</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3958</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Jenny Alva said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3961</link>
    <description><![CDATA[May it has no importance but i am using it personally because it tells a search engine about your website and search engine can easily know about your site. So no need to avoid the use of meta tags.]]></description>
    <pubDate>03/28/11, 087 57 2011 2011:%i:1301295479 06:57:59</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3961</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Anna Hussie said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3983</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Yes this is reality that this does not affect ranking in Google anymore.But these should be used because Yahoo worth it.]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/08/11, 098 11 2011 2011:%i:1302221494 00:11:34</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p3983</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Website Designerss said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4026</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Previously meta tags were the most important factor in ranking search engines. But now it wont consider the meta tags. In future, it may change. If we use meta keyword, the ranking wont decrease. So we can use it. No problem. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/25/11, 115 07 2011 2011:%i:1303697236 02:07:16</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4026</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Web Outsourcing Gateway said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4103</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Meta Keywords can not really do anything for SEO. But a meta description can help users or web visitors since this will serve as a snippet copy or the deciding factor if they will visit your site.<br />
<br />
A good thing for SEO is by utilizing the different types of social media.]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/26/11, 146 45 2011 2011:%i:1306374358 01:45:58</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4103</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Juana Foster said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4109</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Yes yor are right...as per google new algo. they are not consider meta keywords so its useless but other search engine consider meta keywords.]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/29/11, 149 10 2011 2011:%i:1306635034 02:10:34</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4109</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Benivolent Softtech said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4117</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Probably for website promotion,meta keywords will be one of the part and Google will like mostly fresh content after the algorithm changes.<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/31/11, 151 05 2011 2011:%i:1306821909 06:05:09</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4117</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Connect Sw said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4129</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<br />
Yes you are right...this is as per Google new algo. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>06/04/11, 155 53 2011 2011:%i:1307156004 02:53:24</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4129</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Pooja Saxena said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4192</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>Web Outsourcing Gateway said:</strong> <br />
Meta Keywords can not really do anything for SEO. But a meta description can help users or web visitors since this will serve as a snippet copy or the deciding factor if they will visit your site.<br />
<br />
A good thing for SEO is by utilizing the different types of social media.</blockquote><br />
yes Web Outsourcing Gateway said correct<br />
but meta  keyword is depends on length limit & quality also]]></description>
    <pubDate>07/05/11, 186 21 2011 2011:%i:1309843286 05:21:26</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4192</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Website Designerss said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4193</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Really meta keywords are outdated now. Using it is a wastage of time.]]></description>
    <pubDate>07/06/11, 187 01 2011 2011:%i:1309928462 05:01:02</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4193</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Matt Clarke said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4261</link>
    <description><![CDATA[No search engines use the keyword meta tag any more, the main parts they use and the header, description and of course the page content. But that is just the beginning, imagine how may pages in the world will have the same title and descriptor as yourself? Millions, so try and make it local search terms rather than national, you might have some success. I only say might.]]></description>
    <pubDate>08/22/11, 234 52 2011 2011:%i:1314006767 09:52:47</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4261</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Pinkhand Tech said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4334</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Use new and innovative keywords, and keywords should be relevant..<br />
And keep on updating your keywords time by time..]]></description>
    <pubDate>09/21/11, 264 41 2011 2011:%i:1316576499 03:41:39</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4334</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Vikram Randhawa said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4362</link>
    <description><![CDATA[No...<br />
Meta tag of Keywords is very useful for the Optimization of your website..]]></description>
    <pubDate>09/29/11, 272 26 2011 2011:%i:1317270410 04:26:50</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p4362</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>. Alicka said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5175</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>Navin Prakash said:</strong> <br />
Google stops the "keywords" meta tag in ranking web search results, for details please read here:<br />
<br />
<a class="external" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.c...a-tag.html">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.c...a-tag.html</a><br />
<br />
But yaar they didn&#39;t mention that if we still use "Keyword" meta tag in our site then it can be harmful for our site?? Undecided If some body know about it please suggest me here...</blockquote><br />
<br />
No, having keywords in your meta will not be harmful. The keyword in meta is ignored by main search engines (Google and Bing).<br />
What important to understand is if you have a site and you use internal search crawler (often used by intranet within larger organizations), there&#39;s a switch to use keyword meta-tag or not. (default is also ignore <img src="/images/emoticons/smile.png" class="smiley" />, but can be changed to true). So, neither google nor bing penalize you for putting anything you need into that keyword meta.]]></description>
    <pubDate>11/22/11, 326 15 2011 2011:%i:1321978543 16:15:43</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5175</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Hookheath Webdesign said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5842</link>
    <description><![CDATA[meta tags still have some life left in them; they are sometimes used as the snippet of a site&#39;s content in search engine result pages by Google, and possibly other search engines. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>11/28/11, 332 41 2011 2011:%i:1322448086 02:41:26</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5842</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Mannu Sharma said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5843</link>
    <description><![CDATA[I also read that google does not give the importance to keywords meta tags but we are still using this tag. why? we can analyze practically in two sites. i will use in first site meta keywords and in other one i will not use then i will see the effect of meta keyword tag. what you say about this idea? ]]></description>
    <pubDate>11/28/11, 332 35 2011 2011:%i:1322462111 06:35:11</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5843</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Hassan Thomas said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5854</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Meta keywords are part of On-Page SEO and without On-Page SEO off-Page SEO is not very successful. so before starting Link Building/ Off-Page SEO you should complete On-Page SEO Works.]]></description>
    <pubDate>11/29/11, 333 45 2011 2011:%i:1322570721 12:45:21</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5854</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Peter Freeman said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5864</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Can any one suggest me if we use dublin meta tag at website then it will be benefit or harmfull. please suggest me....<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>12/06/11, 340 56 2011 2011:%i:1323154614 06:56:54</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5864</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Pravin Ganore said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5868</link>
    <description><![CDATA[It is true that google stopped giving importance to meta tags but we should updated them while doing onpage optimization of our websites because there are quiet a lot of other search engines like yahoo and bing which still give importance to meta tags..<br />
<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>12/07/11, 341 53 2011 2011:%i:1323233624 04:53:44</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5868</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>James John said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5872</link>
    <description><![CDATA[I am not agree. Actually keywords which you are using anywhere in your website is helpful for better search engine ranking.<br />
<br />
Because Google and other search engine see the keyword relevancy in entire page not only in few areas of website.]]></description>
    <pubDate>12/07/11, 341 52 2011 2011:%i:1323244350 07:52:30</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5872</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Jason Podwojski said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5876</link>
    <description><![CDATA[If you do a google search (UK site) for SEO, you&#39;ll see theat a company called creareseo are at position #1, view their source and you&#39;ll also see that they have no keywords in their meta tags.<br />
<br />
Say&#39;s it all really, back links are king!!]]></description>
    <pubDate>12/09/11, 343 32 2011 2011:%i:1323408731 05:32:11</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5876</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Pacifico Odye said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5968</link>
    <description><![CDATA[I agree back links are king. Backlinks have become so important to the scope of Search Engine Optimization, that they have become some of the main building blocks to good SEO.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>12/16/11, 350 07 2011 2011:%i:1324012026 05:07:06</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5968</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Jami Lex said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5972</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>Pacifico Odye said:</strong> <br />
I agree back links are king. Backlinks have become so important to the scope of Search Engine Optimization, that they have become some of the main building blocks to good SEO.<br />
<br />
</blockquote><br />
Indeed Very truly said, Really Back links have become so important to the scope of Search Engine Optimization. And<br />
i totally agree that meta tags are usefull in SEO any more, Because google have stopped giving importance to meta tags.]]></description>
    <pubDate>12/21/11, 355 45 2011 2011:%i:1324435542 02:45:42</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p5972</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Social Factoryuk said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p6523</link>
    <description><![CDATA[What ?? are you serious ? No meta tags ?? :O<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>01/09/12, 009 06 2012 2012:%i:1326099974 09:06:14</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p6523</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Betty Carter said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p6819</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Meta keywords are very important. When it comes to the description it holds its own  place. Just try this,go to the google search and type the keyword you want. You can see that where ever in the description the keyword is found is in bold.Moreover many times the short description makes the user to visit your site.]]></description>
    <pubDate>02/01/12, 032 17 2012 2012:%i:1328084274 08:17:54</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p6819</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Greg Barrett said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p6831</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>Herman Brummer said:</strong> <br />
one, thing that they are still used by is directories, so they have some value, but that would hardly count half a percent</blockquote><br />
<br />
<br />
True but nowadays its more useful for building local citations and only submitting to high quality directories.]]></description>
    <pubDate>02/02/12, 033 46 2012 2012:%i:1328204808 17:46:48</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p6831</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Iconweb Services said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8385</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Nice post.Thank you so much for sharing this post.<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>02/23/12, 054 55 2012 2012:%i:1329980107 06:55:07</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8385</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Michellew Michellew said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8408</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Meta tags were the most important factor in ranking search engines. But now it wont consider the meta tags. In future, it may change. If we use meta keyword, the ranking wont decrease. So we can use it. No problem. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>03/10/12, 070 26 2012 2012:%i:1331342793 01:26:33</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8408</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Beth Cates said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8421</link>
    <description><![CDATA[The same to you,thanks]]></description>
    <pubDate>03/21/12, 081 30 2012 2012:%i:1332369018 22:30:18</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8421</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Sean Bernett said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8446</link>
    <description><![CDATA[content, link quality, anchor text, social media, title tags; in that order of importance.]]></description>
    <pubDate>04/02/12, 093 19 2012 2012:%i:1333369181 12:19:41</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8446</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Racks Jackson said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8481</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Meta Keywords is not useful in terms of ranking . If you put meta keywords in your website , competitors know your keyword which is not good ]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/07/12, 128 14 2012 2012:%i:1336360488 03:14:48</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8481</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Qingqing Lee said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8487</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Just want to say you are great...like this topic so much...learning more ine here.<br />
________________<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/10/12, 131 13 2012 2012:%i:1336623191 04:13:11</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8487</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Vishal Sharma said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8499</link>
    <description><![CDATA[meta keywords can&#39;t harm to websites. It is just their opinion not to use it.<br />
<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/12/12, 133 41 2012 2012:%i:1336804904 06:41:44</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8499</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Suresh Babu said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8507</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Google is not considering the meta keywords tag because many people are stuffing it.<br />
]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/16/12, 137 34 2012 2012:%i:1337150058 06:34:18</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/news/keywords_meta_tag_not_useful_in_seo/#p8507</guid>
   </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
