<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>Photoshop CS file sizes | WPDFD.com Forums</title>
  <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/web_design_software/photoshop_cs_file_sizes/</link>
  <description>A Web Design Software forum thread at WPDFD.com</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <pubDate>05/23/04, 144 43 2004 2004:%i:1085352211 18:43:31</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>06/07/13, 158 49 2013 2013:%i:1370594943 04:49:03</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NineLabs Framework Feed Generator</generator>
  <managingEditor>sitemaster@wpdfd.com</managingEditor>
  <webMaster>sitemaster@wpdfd.com</webMaster>
     <item>
    <title>Crumpet  said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/web_design_software/photoshop_cs_file_sizes/#p949</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Hi,<br /><br />Up until now I've been using my old Photoshop 5.5, but recently I've been playing with Photoshop CS. &nbsp;I really like it, except that it seems save files at extremely overblown sizes. &nbsp;This morning I did a little test -- I created the exact same file (simple black text over a white background) in both versions of Photoshop, and 5.5 saved the file at 20KB while CS saved it at 64KB. &nbsp;Does anyone know why this happens, and have any tips on how to change it? &nbsp;I haven't bouhgt CS yet -- I'm just testing it out -- but had planned on buying it in the near future. &nbsp;Before I do, I want to find out if I'll be stuck with massive file sizes on everything...]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/23/04, 144 43 2004 2004:%i:1085352211 18:43:31</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/web_design_software/photoshop_cs_file_sizes/#p949</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Joe Gillespie said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/web_design_software/photoshop_cs_file_sizes/#p950</link>
    <description><![CDATA[You haven't said what file format you were saving to. I haven't seen any difference with GIF, PNG or JPEG files saved with CS and previous versions. Those are the only ones that matter.]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/23/04, 144 57 2004 2004:%i:1085367425 22:57:05</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/web_design_software/photoshop_cs_file_sizes/#p950</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Crumpet  said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/web_design_software/photoshop_cs_file_sizes/#p951</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Sorry -- I was saving as JPG.]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/24/04, 145 24 2004 2004:%i:1085387059 04:24:19</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/web_design_software/photoshop_cs_file_sizes/#p951</guid>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>Joe Gillespie said:</title>
    <link>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/web_design_software/photoshop_cs_file_sizes/#p952</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>crumpet said:</strong><br />
Sorry -- I was saving as JPG.</blockquote><br /><br />Okay, if you examime the other factors that can affect a JPEG's apparent size (other than the program used)<br /><br />There a lot of setting in there and some of them are different in CS.<br /><br />For instance, the quality slider in Save as... (JPEG) now goes up to 120 instead of 100 - so the same numeric value will give different amounts of compression between 5.5 and CS. There there are the various optimisations that can be switched on and off.<br /><br />Save as... and Save for Web give different results.<br /><br />If you have a different OS or hard disk, the reported size can vary substantially because of the different block sizes.<br /><br />With JPEGs, it's quite difficult to make comparisons but you would need to make as many aspects as common as possible.]]></description>
    <pubDate>05/24/04, 145 14 2004 2004:%i:1085390072 05:14:32</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.wpdfd.com/forums/wpdfd/web_design_software/photoshop_cs_file_sizes/#p952</guid>
   </item>
   </channel>
</rss